When restrictions in a trust frustrate the purposes of the trust a court will often ease the restrictions as a recent New York case illustrates.
When people leave money in a trust, charitable or otherwise, it is not uncommon for them to restrict how the money can be used and invested. This is normally done to ensure the money is not wasted by beneficiaries and that trustees do not make foolish investment decisions. However, restrictions that might have seemed wise at the time often become burdensome later and actually frustrate the purpose of the trust.
The Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog reported on one such case in “Rockefeller University Wins Legal Battle Over Will Restrictions.”
James P. Martin of New York created a testamentary trust in his will that named specific income beneficiaries. When the last of those beneficiaries passed away, the trust was to be dissolved and a new trust created that gave the remaining principle to Rockefeller University for the purposes of combating arteriosclerosis.
The university took control of the funds in 2007.
The will included many restrictions on how the university could invest the funds in the trust. There were restrictions about what stocks could be sold and what type of securities could be purchased. The result was that the trust investments severely underperformed the market and the university’s general endowment.
The university petitioned the court to ease the restrictions, which the court agreed to do.
This was a fairly straightforward case as some of the corporate stock not to be sold was in companies that no longer existed and many of the restrictions clashed with modern portfolio theory.
What this illustrates is that courts can overturn old trust restrictions when necessary.
Reference: Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog (Sept. 3, 2016) “Rockefeller University Wins Legal Battle Over Will Restrictions.”
I heard Cindy’s presentation at a Senior Luncheon at my church, and was very impressed. She helped my daughter and me understand many aspects of elder law. Josh has also been very helpful in my planning to enter an independent living situation . I have told many friends about them.
The very best elder law attorney and staff anyone could ever ask for! I have referred a number of clients to Cindy and she never disappoints. She is kind, caring, and extremely thorough in making sure everything is completed as it should be. I highly recommend Cindy for anyone needing lawyer services; she truly goes above and beyond for every client she helps and has had a huge impact in so many peoples’ lives. Thank you, Cindy and staff, for everything that you do- I’m so glad to know you!
Cindy and the Nelson Elder Care Law team are trustworthy and helpful. They are the experts in elder care law. At Leaf Cremation, we entrust our families to the care of the Nelson team when their services are needed.
Josh Nelson, and his staff, have been amazingly helpful to our family. The ins and outs of nursing homes, the rules and regulations that govern Medicare and Medicaid are daunting and the folks at Nelson Elder Care Law have been informative, responsive, and above all, empathetic. I cannot emphasize enough how their service has taken a weight off of our shoulders especially during a world pandemic that has targeted nursing homes across our country. I highly recommend retaining Josh and his firm!
I had a simple legal question to them that I needed answered and they very helpful in giving me the information I needed. I highly recommend them and will reach out to them if I need more advice or assistance. Thank you for taking your time to just answer a couple of questions I had!